四级考试中阅读理解的题型,以细节性题为主。然而,每次考试四篇文章中对主题题的考察还是有2-3道,如何把这4-6分得到是很多同学感到很棘手的问题。希望通过本文对四级文章主题的分析,同学们能对这种题型有更好的把握。
通常,在做主题题时,大家一般会在文章首段和尾端找答案。或者说认为一般文章中心出现在第一段首。其实,这种情况在四级文章的几率顶多是三分之一。而文章主题出现的方式(即地点)起码有四种(此处所说的主题虽不一定就是主题题的答案,但其中必然含有整个文章所说的中心话题或主体词,或者可以看出作者的褒贬态度。把此句话读懂,在做主题题时可迅速排除至少2个答案)。在此分作细说:
一,开门见山。这种文章的主题最好找。一般来说,开头是个陈述句或者判断句。其后没有对其进行否定。最典型的要算下定义型的文章了。比如90年1月的关于海洋学以及97年1月关于身份的文章。开头都是对海洋学和身份进行了定义,其后展开论述。对于这类文章,大部分同学在做主题题时还是比较好把握的。不过,有两点要注意的地方:
(一),首句作出陈述后,后面的论述有转折,但该转折不是对首句的否定。比如98年1月关于Violin Prodigies(神童)那篇文章,第一段快到末尾处出现转折,但细心的读者会发现,这只是对一个例子内部的转折。不影响整个文章的态度。再如02年1月的老年学那篇文章以及02年6月的absent-mindedness那篇文章,也是这种情况。但一旦读出中心
三,观点对照。四级文章中还有这么一类,文章当中有两种观点形成对照。而这两种观点会以以下两种方式其中一种出现:
(一)纵向(或叫新旧观点)对照,这种观点对照比较简单,开头出现以前的某种观点或者大众的一种普遍观点,典型的形式是:For some time past it was widely accepted that….There is a popular belief among…People tend to be impressed that…Most people would agree…In the old days…The way people hold…文章中心出现的方式是转折或者对老观点的负评价或者现在新观点出现的地方,以but, however, in fact, nowadays, now, fail, neglect等词的出现作为标志。这种找主题的方式较类似于抛砖引玉型文章,就不过多赘述。
(二)横向比较,这种文章一般会有两种对抗型的观点,双方各执己见,分不出到底谁正确。对于这种文章,通常作者的评价即为文章主题。如97年1月关于心理学家对与奖励的不同观点一文,behaviorists和cognitive researchers持不同观点,而作者对两者观点进行了综合,取两者观点有力之处。作者的结论自然就是文章主题所在。所以不需要注意这两派的观点。再如2002年1月关于未来汽车一文。
Some pessimistic experts feel that the automobile is bound to fall into disuse. They see a day in the not-too-distant future when all autos will be abandoned and allowed to rust. Other authorities, however, think the auto is here to stay. They hold that the car will remain a leading means of urban travel in the foreseeable future.
The motorcar will undoubtedly change significantly over the next 30 years. It should become smaller, safer, and more economical, and should not be powered by the gasoline engine. The car of the future should be far more pollution-free than present types.
Regardless of its power source, the auto in the future will still be the main problem in urban traffic congestion (拥挤). One proposed solution to this problem is the automated highway system.
When the auto enters the highway system, a retractable (可伸缩的) arm will drop from the auto and make contact with a rail, which is similar to those powering subway trains electrically. Once attached to the rail, the car will become electrically powered from the system, and control of the vehicle will pass to a central computer. The computer will then monitor all of the car's movements.
The driver will use a telephone to dial instructions about his destination into the system. The computer will calculate the best route, and reserve space for the car all the way to the correct exit from the highway. The driver will then be free to relax and wait for the buzzer (蜂鸣器) that will warn him of his coming exit. It is estimated that an automated highway will be able to handle 10,000 vehicles per hour, compared with the 1,500 to 2,000 vehicles that can be carried by a present-day highway.
有pessimistic experts认为将来汽车会被废止(悲观观点),而other authorities则认为将会继续保持交通主导工具地位不变(过于乐观)。而二段开头作者认为未来30年汽车将会有巨大改变这一观点才是真正主题所在(客观中含有乐观,变化地看待事物)。所以在做这篇文章主题题的变体—态度题
25. What is the author's attitude toward the future of autos?
A) Enthusiastic. B) Pessimistic. C) Optimistic. D) Cautious.
时,只要把第二段开头作者的态度读出来,答案也就很好选了。说白了,对于对抗型观点,读者只需了解作者的观点就行。
四,还有这么一些文章,主题并不是在文章开头几段出现而是在文章末尾,这种文章比较难。不过还是可以通过重点阅读文章末尾加以解决。姑且称其为曲径通幽型文章。这类文章一般在前面几段对中心话题的论述不清不楚,很难判断作者的褒贬态度,直到文章末尾才出现作者明确的态度或评价(且一般为负)。这种类型文章典型有一下几篇:91年6月人工心脏一文,97年6月冰箱一文,03年6月对人们无意识出差错研究一文,以及04年6月氢弹协会一文。以氢弹一文为例.
As soon as it was revealed that a reporter for Progressive magazine had discovered how to make a hydrogen bomb, a group offirearm ( 火器 ) fans formed the National Hydrogen bomb Association, and they are now lobbying against any legislation to stop Americans from owning one.
"The Constitution," said the association's spokesman, "gives everyone the right to own arms. It doesn't spell out what kind of arms. But since anyone can now make a hydrogen bomb, the public should be able to buy it to protect themselves."
"Don't you think it's dangerous to have one in the house, particularly where there are children around?"
"The National Hydrogen bomb Association hopes to educate people in the safe handling of this type of weapon. We are instructing owners to keep the bomb in a locked cabinet and the fuse (导火索 ) separately in a drawer."
"Some people consider the hydrogen bomb a very fatal weapon which could kill somebody."
The spokesman said, "Hydrogen bombs don't kill people - people kill people. The bomb is for self-protection and it also has a deterrent effect. If somebody knows you have a nuclear weapon in your house, they're going to think twice about breaking in."
"But those who want to ban the bomb for American citizens claim that ifyou have one locked in the cabinet, with the fuse in a drawer, you would never be able to assemble it in time to stop an intruder ( 侵入者)"
"Another argument against allowing people to own a bomb is that at the moment it is very expensive to build one. So what your association is backing is a program which would allow the middle and upper classes to acquire a bomb while poor people will be left defenseless with just handguns."
这篇文章时而出现赞成氢弹的论调,时而出现反对 的论调。而文章又是以反对的论调结尾,因而可以判断出作者是反对私人拥有氢弹的(虽然问中没有明确出现作者态度,在此只能从文章末尾感知作者态度)。因而在做最后一道主题题(转变为态度题的考察)
30. From the tone of the passage we know that the author is
A) not serious about the private ownership of H-bombs
B) concerned about the spread of nuclear weapons
C) doubtful about the necessity of keeping H-bombs at home for safety
D) unhappy with those who vote against the ownership of H-bombs
时就比较容易选择了。注意,不能选B或者D,这2项看似合理,但违背了四级文章对事不对人以及不能推理2 大原则。从出现频率上看,这类文章慢慢多了起来,所以应该多加留意。
本文此次集中探讨读四级文章时读出文章中心对于做主题题的指导意义,其实,读懂主题对于做细节题也极具指导作用,具体如何,请听下回分解。
北京 | 天津 | 上海 | 江苏 | 山东 |
安徽 | 浙江 | 江西 | 福建 | 深圳 |
广东 | 河北 | 湖南 | 广西 | 河南 |
海南 | 湖北 | 四川 | 重庆 | 云南 |
贵州 | 西藏 | 新疆 | 陕西 | 山西 |
宁夏 | 甘肃 | 青海 | 辽宁 | 吉林 |
黑龙江 | 内蒙古 |