首页 - 网校 - 万题库 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 导航
热点搜索
学员登录 | 用户名
密码
新学员
老学员
您现在的位置: 考试吧 > 考研 > 考研答案 > 正文

2020年考研《英语一》真题(完整版)

来源:考试吧 2019-12-22 22:10:28 要考试,上考试吧! 考研万题库
“2020年考研《英语一》真题”由考试吧考后发布,更多2020考研答案、2020考研真题等信息,请关注考试吧考研网或搜索公众微信号“万题库考研”!
第 1 页:完形填空
第 2 页:阅读理解
第 5 页:翻译
第 6 页:作文

  Section Ⅱ Reading Comprehension

  Part A

  Directions:

  Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

  Text 1

  21.Copper and her colleague argue that a "town of culture" award would ___.

  A. consolidate the town city ties in Britain

  B. promote cooperation among Brain's towns

  C. increase the economic strength of Brain's towns

  D. focus Brain's limited resources on cultural events.

  22.According to paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as ______..

  A.a sensible compromise

  B.a self-deceiving attempt

  C.an eye-catching bonus

  D.an inaccessible target

  23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it ______

  A. endeavor to maintain its image

  B. meets the aspiration of its people

  C. brings its local arts to prominence

  D. commits to its long-term growth

  24. “Glasgow” is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present ______

  A. a contrasting case

  B. a supporting example

  C. a background story

  D. a related topic

  25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal?

  A. Skeptical B. Objective C. Favorable D. Critical

  Text 2

  Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

  their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.

  With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing industry is in an existential crisis.

  The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers produced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

  The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

  In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

  Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around £500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

  26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

  [A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

  [B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

  [C] its payment for peer review is reduced.

  [D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

  27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

  [A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

  [B] gone through an existential crisis.

  [C] revived the publishing industry.

  [D] financed researchers generously.

  28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

  [A] Relieved.

  [B] Puzzled.

  [C] Concerned

  [D] Encouraged.

  29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

  [A]allow publishers some room to make money.

  [B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

  [C] reduce the cost of publication substantially.

  [D] free universities from financial burdens.

  30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

  [A] Trial subscription is offered.

  [B] Labour triumphs over status.

  [C] Costs are well controlled.

  D] The few feed on the many.

扫描/长按二维码关注获取考研答案
获取2020考研真题答案
获取2020考研资讯
获取2套仿真内部资料
获取考研历年真题答案

考研万题库下载微信搜索"万题库考研"

上一页  1 2 3 4 5 6 下一页

  相关推荐

  2020年考研真题pdf下载2020年考研答案pdf下载热点文章

  2020考研答案2020考研真题考研万题库估分关注微信对答案热点文章

  2020考研政治答案2020考研英语答案2020考研数学答案

  2020年考研成绩查询时间考研复试分数线考研调剂

文章搜索
万题库小程序
万题库小程序
·章节视频 ·章节练习
·免费真题 ·模考试题
微信扫码,立即获取!
扫码免费使用
考研英语一
共计364课时
讲义已上传
53214人在学
考研英语二
共计30课时
讲义已上传
5495人在学
考研数学一
共计71课时
讲义已上传
5100人在学
考研数学二
共计46课时
讲义已上传
3684人在学
考研数学三
共计41课时
讲义已上传
4483人在学
推荐使用万题库APP学习
扫一扫,下载万题库
手机学习,复习效率提升50%!
版权声明:如果考研网所转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系800@exam8.com,我们将会及时处理。如转载本考研网内容,请注明出处。
官方
微信
扫描关注考研微信
领《大数据宝典》
下载
APP
下载万题库
领精选6套卷
万题库
微信小程序
帮助
中心
文章责编:houwenjing