首页 考试吧论坛 Exam8视线 考试商城 网络课程 模拟考试 考友录 实用文档 求职招聘 论文下载
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培训 | 在职研 | 自学考试 | 成人高考 | 法律硕士 | MBA考试
MPA考试 | 中科院
四六级 | 职称英语 | 商务英语 | 公共英语 | 托福 | 雅思 | 专四专八 | 口译笔译 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英语 | 成人英语三级 | 申硕英语 | 攻硕英语 | 职称日语 | 日语学习 | 法语 | 德语 | 韩语
计算机等级考试 | 软件水平考试 | 职称计算机 | 微软认证 | 思科认证 | Oracle认证 | Linux认证
华为认证 | Java认证
公务员 | 报关员 | 银行从业资格 | 证券从业资格 | 期货从业资格 | 司法考试 | 法律顾问 | 导游资格
报检员 | 教师资格 | 社会工作者 | 外销员 | 国际商务师 | 跟单员 | 单证员 | 物流师 | 价格鉴证师
人力资源 | 管理咨询师考试 | 秘书资格 | 心理咨询师考试 | 出版专业资格 | 广告师职业水平
驾驶员 | 网络编辑
卫生资格 | 执业医师 | 执业药师 | 执业护士
会计从业资格考试会计证) | 经济师 | 会计职称 | 注册会计师 | 审计师 | 注册税务师
注册资产评估师 | 高级会计师 | ACCA | 统计师 | 精算师 | 理财规划师 | 国际内审师
一级建造师 | 二级建造师 | 造价工程师 | 造价员 | 咨询工程师 | 监理工程师 | 安全工程师
质量工程师 | 物业管理师 | 招标师 | 结构工程师 | 建筑师 | 房地产估价师 | 土地估价师 | 岩土师
设备监理师 | 房地产经纪人 | 投资项目管理师 | 土地登记代理人 | 环境影响评价师 | 环保工程师
城市规划师 | 公路监理师 | 公路造价师 | 安全评价师 | 电气工程师 | 注册测绘师 | 注册计量师
缤纷校园 | 实用文档 | 英语学习 | 作文大全 | 求职招聘 | 论文下载 | 访谈 | 游戏
考研_考试吧考研_首发2011考研成绩查询
考研网校 模拟考场 考研资讯 复习指导 历年真题 模拟试题 经验 考研查分 考研复试 考研调剂 论坛 短信提醒
考研英语| 资料 真题 模拟题  考研政治| 资料 真题 模拟题  考研数学| 资料 真题 模拟题  专业课| 资料 真题 模拟题  在职研究生

2007年研究生入学考试英语模拟试题

Section II   Reading Comprehension
Part A
Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C, or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.(40 points)

Text 1
As the post-Enron wave of corporate scandals washed over America last year, a common response in Europe was: it couldn’t happen here. Far from having the world’s best-policed markets, the United States, many European politicians claimed, suffered uniquely from a lethal combination of greedy and overpaid bosses, conflicted auditors and investment bankers, reliance on accounting rules not principles, and an obsession with quarterly profit numbers. In America, as many as 1,200 companies have been forced to restate their accounts in the past five years, in Europe the number is barely in double digits. So it is outrageous, many Europeans now argue, that America is seeking to impose the unwieldy Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in the wake of Enron, on European companies listed in New York.
As more sensible European regulators recognize, this smugness was never justified; it is only necessary to recall scandals such as Vivendi and Elan. But Europe’s claim of immunity from corporate slackness has now been blown out of the water by this week’s revelations that Royal Ahold of the Netherlands overstated its profits for 200-02 by as much as $500m. The company’s Amsterdam-based auditors, Deloitte & Touche, failed to pick the problems up in 2001, even though worries about Ahold’s accounts were widely expressed in the markets for most of last year. The Dutch market regulator admitted this week that it had no powers of discipline over faulty auditing.
What about the relative numbers of restatements? Because America’s GAAP accounting system relies on thousands of pages of rules, it is more vulnerable to manipulation than Europe’s more principles-based approach. But given the largely non-existent regulation of auditors and the poor corporate governance prevalent in much of Europe, a more plausible conclusion is that Europe has had fewer accounting scandals than America mainly because nobody has seriously looked for them, not because they are not there.
This is not to say that Europe should adopt Sarbanes-Oxley in toto. That hastily drafted law was designed for America’s very different system. Many of the law’s rules on managers and boards seem unduly intrusive even for America. But statutory, independent regulation of auditors, as prescribed by Sarbanes-Oxley, makes sense everywhere. So do rules to stop accounting firms doing consulting work for audit clients; and it is also worth considering mandatory rotation of auditors.
The case for independent regulation is the stronger because European Union companies are due to adopt international accounting standards by 2005. It is little use taking this welcome step towards tougher standards, which the Europeans are urging on America in the interests of global harmonization, if there is nobody to oversee the rules. Yet the European Federation of Accountants admits that, in six EU countries, there is in effect no enforcement at all.

21. Which of following it true according to Paragraph 1?
[A] Many European politicians would boast of immunity from America’s corporate ills.
[B] Many companies suffered from their absolute reliance upon accounting rules.
[C] Many Europeans protested against America’s principles imposed upon European firms.
[D] Many European regulators responded sensibly to the wave of corporate scandals.

22. The phrase “in toto” (Line 1, Paragraph 4) most probably means
[A] based upon sensibility.
[B] following in a haste.
[C] given a difference system.
[D] acting in a similar fashion.

23. In contrast to American, Europe, in coping with faulty corporate auditing, would attach importance to
[A] rule enforcement.
[B] reliable principles.
[C] justified prescription.
[D] frequent restatements.

24. It seem that the ultimate solution to the problem of corporate scandals lies in
[A] the interests of global harmonization.
[B] the independent regulation of auditors.
[C] the adoption of tougher standards.
[D] the supervision of consulting work.

25. According to the author, the European corporate situation is
[A] fairly optimistic.
[B] quite promising.
[C] somewhat depressing.
[D] very astonishing.

上一页  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 下一页
文章搜索
任汝芬老师
在线名师:任汝芬老师
   著名政治教育专家;研究生、博士生导师;中国国家人事人才培...[详细]
考研栏目导航
版权声明:如果考研网所转载内容不慎侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系800@exam8.com,我们将会及时处理。如转载本考研网内容,请注明出处。