考研英语阅读理解命题思路透析和真题揭秘(36)

　　2006年Text2

　　Stratford-on-Avon, as we all know, has only one industry-William Shakespeare-but there are two distinctly separate and increasingly hostile branches. There is the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC), which presents superb productions of the plays at the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre on the Avon. And there are the townsfolk who largely live off the tourists who come, not to see the plays, but to look at Anne Hathaway's Cottage, Shakespeare's birthplace and the other sights.

　　The worthy residents of Stratford doubt that the theatre adds a penny to their revenue. They frankly dislike the RSC's actors, them with their long hair and beards and sandals and noisiness. It's all deliciously ironic when you consider that Shakespeare, who earns their living, was himself an actor (with a beard) and did his share of noise - making.

　　The tourist streams are not entirely separate. The sightseers who come by bus- and often take in Warwick Castle and Blenheim Palace on the side - don't usually see the plays, and some of them are even surprised to find a theatre in Stratford. However, the playgoers do manage a little sight - seeing along with their playgoing. It is the playgoers, the RSC contends, who bring in much of the town's revenue because they spend the night (some of them four or five nights) pouring cash into the hotels and restaurants. The sightseers can take in everything and get out of town by nightfall.

　　The townsfolk don't see it this way and local council does not contribute directly to the subsidy of the Royal Shakespeare Company. Stratford cries poor traditionally. Nevertheless every hotel in town seems to be adding a new wing or cocktail lounge. Hilton is building its own hotel there, which you may be sure will be decorated with Hamlet Hamburger Bars, the Lear Lounge, the Banquo Banqueting Room, and so forth, and will be very expensive.

　　Anyway, the townsfolk can't understand why the Royal Shakespeare Company needs a subsidy. (The theatre has broken attendance records for three years in a row. Last year its 1,431 seats were 94 per cent occupied all year long and this year they'll do better.) The reason, of course, is that costs have rocketed and ticket prices have stayed low.

　　It would be a shame to raise prices too much because it would drive away the young people who are Stratford's most attractive clientele. They come entirely for the plays, not the sights. They all seem to look alike (though they come from all over) -lean, pointed, dedicated faces, wearing jeans and sandals, eating their buns and bedding down for the night on the flagstones outside the theatre to buy the 20 seats and 80 standing-room tickets held for the sleepers and sold to them when the box office opens at 10:30 a.m.

　　29. According to the townsfolk, the RSC deserves no subsidy because

　　[A] ticket prices can be raised to cover the spending

　　[B] the company is financially ill-managed

　　[C] the behavior of the actors is not socially acceptable

　　[D] the theatre attendance is on the rise

　　[答案] D

　　[解题思路]

　　本题对应的信息是文章第五段。小镇居民们不认为RSC需要补贴，理由为该段括号中的内容，即"The theatre has broken attendance records for three years in a row. Last year its 1,431 seats were 94 per cent occupied all year long and this year they'll do better"(剧院已经连续三年打破了上座率纪录。去年一整年剧院1431个座位的上坐率达到了94%，今年还会更高)。简而言之就是剧院的上座率一直在提高，因此居民们认为RSC赚钱应该不成问题，所以正确答案为D。A选项的错误原因在于第五段最后一句话明确提到剧院的票价一直保持在较低的水平，并没有通过提高票价来弥补支出。B选项的错误在于并没有提及RSC是否存在经营不善的问题。C选项的错误在于信息错位，即演员的行为是否为社会所接受这一信息并没有出现在该段，且与RSC是否需要补贴的问题无关。

　　[题目译文]

　　小镇居民们认为RSC不应该要补贴，因为

　　[A] 可以通过提高票价来补贴开支

　　[B] 公司财政上经营不善

　　[C] 演员的行为不能被社会接受

　　[D] 剧院的上座率一直在上升

　　相关推荐：考研英语阅读理解命题思路透析和真题揭秘
　　　　　　　2009年考研英语历年真题阅读理解精读笔记汇总