13.【答案】 The action of Xinghao Company is illegal.According to the provision of Contract Law，the party required to perform first may suspend its performance if it has conclusive evidence showing that the other party has engaged in transferring assets or evading debts.In this case， Xinghao Company is only doubtful about the situation that A Company evades the debt but it does not have conclusive evidence，SO Xinghao Company cannot exercise unsafe right of defense. 【附中文翻译】兴浩公司的行为不合法。根据《合同法》的规定，应当先履行债务的当事 人，有确切证据证明对方有转移财产、逃避债务的情形，可以中止履行合同。本案例中， 兴浩公司仅仅是听说A公司有逃避债务的情形，而没有“确切证据”证明，此时不能行 使不安抗辩权。

　　【附题干翻译】根据资料(六)，兴浩公司8月20日中止履行合同的行为是否合法?简要 分析理由。

　　14.【答案】 A Company should not require trading company to FetalTl the goods.According to the provision of Sa/es Contract Explanation，if the sales contract is valid and all buyers reauire actually performing the contract，if the buyer who firstly accepts goods requires confirming that the ownership has been transferred，the People’S Court should support.In this case.As Xinghao Company has delivered 30 pieces ofprecise instruments to the Trading Companv.The Trading Company can require confirming the ownership but A Company cannot require Trading Company to Tetulll.

　　【附中文翻译】A公司不得要求贸易公司返还该批货物。根据《买卖合同解释》的规定， 在买卖合同均有效的情况下，买受人均要求实际履行合同的，先行受领交付的买受人请 求确认所有权已经转移的，人民法院应予支持。本题中，由于兴浩公司已经将30台精密 仪器交付了贸易公司，贸易公司可以请求确认所有权，A公司不能要求贸易公司返还。

　　【附题干翻译】根据资料(六)，A公司是否可以要求贸易公司返还该批货物?简要分析 理由。

　　15.【答案】 A Company may require Xinghao Company to assume the liability for breach of contract. According to the regulation，if the party who claims to exercise unsafe right of defense does not have conclusive evidence to prove that the performance is suspended，he should assume the liability for breach of contract.In this case，Xinghao Company wrongly exercises unsafe right of defense and signs multiple sales contracts，which leads to that the contract signed with A Company cannot being performed and he should assume liability for breach of contract to A Company.

　　【附中文翻译】A公司可以要求兴浩公司承担违约责任。根据规定，主张不安抗辩权的当 事人如果没有确切证据证明中止履行的，应当承担违约责任。本案例中，兴浩公司不正 当的行使不安抗辩权和签订多重买卖合同，致使与A公司签订的合同无法履行，应当向 A公司承担违约责任。

　　【附题千翻译】根据资料(六)，请说明A公司可否要求兴浩公司承担违约责任?简要分 析理由。

　　相关推荐：

　　2014年注册会计师考试大纲+变化+解读(各科目)

　　2014注册会计师考点强化试题及解析汇总(各科目)

　　2014年注册会计师考试各科目选择习题及解析汇总